Post-Hartree-Fock Atomic Kinetic Energies Data Glossary
I Background
Very accurate Hartree-Fock (HF) wave functions IJQC.71.491 (1) for the first 86 neutral atoms were used to compute post-SCF kinetic energies for a variety of single-point kinetic energy density functionals (KEDFs). Those HF wave functions are significantly improved over the widely used Clementi & Roetti compilation ClementiRoetti (2). Orbital occupancies were obtained from the original dataset and degenerate orbitals were fractionally occupied.
Kinetic energies were obtained by numerical integration using a double exponential radial quadrature DoubleExponential (3) with , and 200 points for all atoms. The numerical integration was confirmed to reproduce the first 15 digits of the Kohn-Sham non-interacting kinetic energy obtained by analytical integration over the semi-infinite interval.
II Notation
Hartree atomic units are used in all formulae. The notation of functions and constants is as follows:
- •
, the electron number density.
- •
.
- •
, the Thomas-Fermi constant.
- •
, the reduced density gradient.
- •
, the reduced density Laplacian.
- •
. the reduced quadratic density Hessian.
- •
.
- •
, a conversion factor.
In the summary below, analytic expressions for the non-interacting KEDFs are given for the spin-unpolarized case (. For spin-polarized electron densities, the corresponding expression can be obtained directly by applying the spin-scaling relation OliverPerdew (4)
| (1) |
The general form of a one-point KEDF is
| (2) |
where is the Thomas-Fermi kinetic energy density per unit volume (defined below), and is the enhancement function.
III Kinetic Energy Density Functionals
The header of each entry shows the notation used in the pop-up periodic table.
TFW: Thomas-Fermi plus von Weizsäcker
| (7) |
TF5W: Thomas-Fermi plus von Weizsäcker
| (8) |
L04 and L06: Laricchia, Constantin, Fabiano, and Della Sala Lk (28)
| (36) |
| (37) |
| (38) |
| (39) |
with (L0.4) or (L0.6)
revMGGA and revMGGAloc: Cancio, Stewart, and Kuna revMGGA (29); Cancio and Redd revMGGAloc (30)
Note (23 Nov. 2020): In Cancio and Redd
revMGGAloc (30) these are called mGGArev4 and mGGAloc4
respectively. There is no explicit equation for mGGAloc4 there
but it can be ascertained by examining their Eq. (37), which gives
their “local GEA”, including the coefficients listed below. That in
combination with their Eqs. (20) and (21) gives the mGGAloc4
form shown here. It also is described briefly in their
section 4.5. (see also Figure 8 and Table 2): “the short-dashed and
dot-dashed lines show the mGGAloc with and ,
which adhere to the local GEA outside the transition region.”
| (40) |
| (41) |
| (42) |
| (43) |
| (44) |
where is the Heaviside unit step function.
References
- (1) T. Koga, K. Kanayama, S. Watanabe and A.J. Thakkar, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 71, 491-97 (1999).
- (2) E. Clementi and C. Roetti, At. Data and Nucl. Data Tab. 14, 177-478 (1974).
- (3) M. Mitani, Theor. Chem. Acc. 130, 645-69 (2011).
- (4) G.L. Oliver and J.P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. A 20, 397 (1979).
- (5) L.H. Thomas, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 23, 542 (1927)
- (6) E. Fermi, Z. Phys. 48, 72 (1928).
- (7) C.F. von Weizsäcker, Z. Phys. 96, 431 (1935).
- (8) A. Kompaneets and E. Pavlovskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 4, 328 (1957).
- (9) D.A. Kirzhnits, Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 64 (1957).
- (10) C.H. Hodges, Can. J. Phys. 51, 1428 (1973).
- (11) E. Pearson, PhD Thesis, Harvard University, USA (1982).
- (12) A.E. DePristo and J.D. Kress, Phys. Rev. A 35, 438 (1987).
- (13) H. Lee, C.T. Lee and R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. A 44, 768 (1991).
- (14) H. Ou-Yang and M. Levy, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 40, 379 (1991).
- (15) J.P. Perdew, Phys. Lett. A 165, 79 (1992).
- (16) A.J. Thakkar, Phys. Rev. A 46, 6920 (1992).
- (17) A. Lembarki and H. Chermette, Phys. Rev. A 50, 5328 (1994).
- (18) S. Liu and R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. A 55, 1792 (1997).
- (19) L. Vitos, B. Johansson, J. Kollár and H.L. Skriver, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052511 (2000).
- (20) M. Ernzerhof, J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 59, 201 (2000).
- (21) F. Tran and T.A. Wesolowski, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 89, 441 (2002).
- (22) V.V. Karasiev, S.B. Trickey and F.E. Harris, J. Comput.-Aided Mater. Des. 13, 111 (2006).
- (23) J.P. Perdew and L.A. Constantin, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155109 (2007).
- (24) L.M. Ghiringhelli and L. Delle Site, Phys. Rev. B 77, 073104 (2008).
- (25) V.V. Karasiev, R.S. Jones, S.B. Trickey and F.E. Harris, Phys. Rev. B 80, 245120 (2009).
- (26) L.A. Constantin, E. Fabiano, S. Laricchia and F. Della Sala, Phys. Rev. Let. 106, 186406 (2011).
- (27) V.V. Karasiev, D. Chakraborty, O.A. Shukruto and S.B. Trickey, Phys. Rev. B 88, 161108 (2013).
- (28) S. Laricchia, L.A. Constantin, E. Fabiano and F. Della Sala J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 164 (2014).
- (29) A.C. Cancio, D. Stewart and A. Kuna, J. Chem. Phys. 144, 084107 (2016).
- (30) A.C. Cancio and J.J. Redd, Mol. Phys. 115, 618 (2017).
- (31) S. Śmiga, E. Fabiano, L.A. Constantin and F. Della Sala, J. Chem. Phys. 146, 064105 (2017).
- (32) L.A. Constantin, E. Fabiano, S. Śmiga and F. Della Sala, Phys. Rev. B 95, 115153 (2017).
- (33) D. Mejia-Rodriguez and S.B. Trickey, Phys. Rev. A 96, 052512 (2017).
- (34) P. de Silva and C. Corminboeuf, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 3745 (2014).
- (35) K. Luo, V.V. Karasiev, and S.B. Trickey, Phys. Rev. B 98, 041111(R) (2018).